Faktatjek af TjekDet's faktatjek af min side om,
at SARS-CoV-2 aldrig er isoleret
I en artikel af på det Politisk afhængige medie tjekdet dot dk ligger er pt. et såkaldt faktatjek, af den aktindsigt som Alex Holmstedt lavede sidste år, sidenhen har yderligere 120 andre agtindsigter ellers afsløret det samme, netop at SARS-CoV-2 ikke er isoleret...
I dette "faktatjek" har de snakket med Christian Morberg Wejse, og artiklen skriver således:
Men ifølge Christian Wejse, der er lektor i infektionssygdomme og folkesundhed ved Aarhus Universitet og afdelingslæge på Aarhus Universitetshospital, burde det være let for netop Statens Serum Institut at levere dokumentation for virussens eksistens.
“Det undrer mig, at Statens Serum Institut ikke har et bedre svar. Det er jo dem, der sidder og laver kortlægningen af virussen, og det må de jo have liggende lige ved hånden,” siger han og peger på flere studier, som han ville have sendt, hvis han var blevet spurgt."
Artiklen peger så på et specifikt studie, en såkaldt published medical artikel:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2008-3
Men en garvet læge som mig (har samme lægefaglige uddannelse som bill gates har på det område), som er god til at læse published medical artikler kan imidlertid, sagtens splitte en sådan artikel ad, og se hvad der er op og ned deri...
I den pågældende published medical artikel skrives nemlig bl.a.:
"To investigate the possible aetiological agents associated with this disease, we collected bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and performed deep meta-transcriptomic sequencing. The clinical specimen was handled in a biosafety level 3 laboratory at Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center. Total RNA was extracted from 200 μl of BALF and a meta-transcriptomic library was constructed for pair-end (150-bp reads) sequencing using an Illumina MiniSeq as previously described4,6,7,8. In total, we generated 56,565,928 sequence reads that were de novo-assembled and screened for potential aetiological agents. Of the 384,096 contigs assembled by Megahit9, the longest (30,474 nucleotides (nt)) had a high abundance and was closely related to a bat SARS-like coronavirus (CoV) isolate—bat SL-CoVZC45 (GenBank accession number MG772933)—that had previously been sampled in China, with a nucleotide identity of 89.1% (Supplementary Tables 1, 2). The genome sequence of this virus, as well as its termini, were determined and confirmed by reverse-transcription PCR (RT–PCR)10 and 5′/3′ rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE), respectively. This virus strain was designated as WH-Human 1 coronavirus (WHCV) (and has also been referred to as ‘2019-nCoV’) and its whole genome sequence (29,903 nt) has been assigned GenBank accession number MN908947. Remapping the RNA-sequencing data to the complete genome of WHCV resulted in an assembly of 123,613 reads, providing 99.99% genome coverage at a mean depth of 6.04× (range, 0.01–78.84×) (Extended Data Fig. 3). The viral load in the BALF sample was estimated by qPCR to be 3.95 × 108 copies per ml (Extended Data Fig. 4)."
Problemet i det der står der, er at de angiveligt har identificeret og bekræftet virussen med en RT-PCR-TEST, som bliver holdt op i mod GenBank accession number: MN908947 (WH-Human 1 coronavirus (WHCV)).
MN908947(.1, .2 og .3) genomen oprindeligt er computergenereret, for når man klikke ind på de proteiner den indeholder (QHD43415.1), kan man se at der er tale om underliggende proteiner fra andre vira..
TjekDet kom igen, SARS-CoV-2 er aldrig isoleret 😜
https://it-nørden.dk/covid-not-isolated/